And if you do think anything else, won't you please share it with the forum instead of making accusations which can easily be contradicted? le.pilote can swear while I can't? The rule says absolutely no swearing?
Dear Millie, you sound so angry, but perhaps that's just me misinterpreting your manner of speaking, so I will decide to assume that you only have the best intentions in mind. You absolutely made very many good points in your post today, however, if I may say so, these are points that, if I remember correctly (I'm starting to forget who said what), have already been made by various people in these discussions since the new rules. Still good points, though!
Ok, I wasn't going to comment further in this thread, but since you are saying "please", I will. I have shared quite a few of my thoughts in the past few weeks, a lot of them which have gone unanswered, and I'm not going to repost them here. Apart from quite a few protests I've made against what I perceive (n.b. my personal perception) as aggressive behaviour, I have made suggestions - n.b. in the spirit of increased understanding (which I have emphasised) - ranging from a suggestion of a thread on cultural understanding (which was shot down) to suggestions on management skills (which went unanswered). I apologise if I'm not good at backtracking using the forum interface, or I could post the links here if you are genuinely interested in my thoughts. Perhaps you are better at using the "find post" feature than what I am, so please go back and read them and feel free to comment on them, I'd be most grateful. Also, I think some of them are no longer viewable as one (or was it two?) threads that were moved. But then again, as you stated earlier today that you "no longer see the point" in our thoughts and that it's only us "making the atmosphere bad"... I interpret that as that you do NOT want people to continue this what you call "anti-movement" so I'm getting a bit confused. Are we to keep discussing this or are we not? And which members exactly are part of this supposed anti-movement? Is there a list available so one can check if one's on it or not?
Besides, I find the term "anti-movement" a bit harsh, and would prefer if we members did not get bundled into one lump and given such a negative label. It's from that viewpoint that I was shocked at your outburst. To me, it came across as that you were yelling and ranting, but again, that may just be your way of expressing yourself. If you insist that was not your intention, I'll take your word for it.
Honestly, it's all becoming too confusing for me. The members find some of the staff's attitude aggressive and unbearable, and the staff find some of the members' attitude aggressive and unbearable. But in order to stop being so off-topic (as both Lucs, yourself and SarahAlex pointed out) I'll end my post on this note, that I am happy to discuss my previous thoughts and suggestions, i.e. if they are still of interest and if they are still useful. And please note that I am FOR increased understanding and peace and not AGAINST. I like this board, despite the bickering and arguing that's been going on. I can't promise that I won't protest again though, if people are being what I see as unfair. :wink:
Now if I could only figure out whether I'm really supposed to keep posting my thoughts or not... well, not in this thread, anyway, this discussion should rightly move on into a discussion thread, if at all.
Kind regards.
